JP Morgan should make no apologies to the Chinese Communist Party

It is understandable that financiers might be worried about upsetting the Chinese authorities. Western banks and fund managers have been trying to break into what should become an immensely lucrative and fast-growing market for years.

As yet, the promise has not added up to much. China opened its markets to foreign firms more than three decades ago, but tight rules have meant they remain relative minnows compared with domestic banks and brokerages.

It was only at the beginning of last year that global financial businesses were allowed to take majority interests in joint ventures. Dimon issued a statement at the time describing China as “one of the largest opportunities in the world for many of our clients”. 

This August, JP Morgan became the first foreign company to be granted permission to take full control of a securities business in China.

Despite the slow liberalisation of the markets, tensions can quickly flare. In 2019, the Swiss bank UBS came under huge pressure to fire an economist whose offhand comment about pigs snowballed into an online scandal.

All of which adds up to a compelling case for JP Morgan to go into firefighting mode and Dimon to apologise for his remarks. Yet that still doesn’t necessarily mean he was right to do so. 

For one thing, Dimon’s bluntness, while occasionally problematic for JP Morgan, is incredibly refreshing. The banker is a rare island of straight-talking directness in a vast sea of dull, anodyne and, quite often, meaningless corporate blah.

The world would be a far more boring place if bosses didn’t occasionally stuff their expensively shod feet past their flawless dentistry. 

You could even argue Dimon’s gaffes are a net benefit for the bank. His plain speaking signals his authenticity and sets him out as one of the few people on Wall Street who is prepared to call out bulls*** when he sees it. 

Dimon, let’s not forget, is the only senior boss who was elevated to his position before the financial crisis and is still in his job. A biography entitled “Last Man Standing” was first published in 2009 – and he’s still standing 12 years later. 

Related Posts

Ukraine can give the occupiers in Crimea an “explosive” summer, – ex-SBU employee

Stupak added that by erecting fortifications against the landing of sabotage groups, the occupiers are spoiling their holiday season Stupak said that Ukraine could arrange an “explosive”…

How many Kinzhal missiles are left in Russia’s arsenal: the Main Intelligence Directorate responded

The Main Intelligence Directorate reported that every month the Russians produce several units of this type of missile. The Main Intelligence Directorate noted that Russia, during attacks…

Not only the Netherlands wants to buy Patriot for Ukraine, – Kuleba

According to Kuleba, there is now reason to believe that there will be “good news” on Patriot, because there is no longer any need to look for…

An ex-SBU employee suggested how F-16 fighters could help Ukraine

Stupak believes that the fighters will be sent specifically to cover Ukrainian troops at the front. Stupak assessed how F-16 aircraft will help Ukraine / photo Getty…

If Ukraine loses, Iran’s bases will be in Europe: experts are trying to reason with Congress

Experts also warned American lawmakers about Iranian ballistic missiles. Analysts appealed to legislators with a warning / photo ua.depositphotos.com The successful cooperation between Iran and the Russian…

The latest military equipment was presented in Ukraine: there is an interesting example (video)

The most interesting example was a six-wheeled armored vehicle. New models of military equipment were presented in Ukraine / screenshot The latest models of Ukrainian military equipment…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *