How Britain got smart motorways so wrong

Sir Mike Penning, the coalition government’s roads minister, signed off a £2 billion smart motorways project in 2013, but has always insisted he was unaware Highways England would fit those emergency areas 1.5 miles apart, instead of every third of a mile, as in the M42 trial. Last year, the smart motorway death toll reached 38.

Meera Naran called for a review after her eight-year-old son, Dev, was killed in 2018 on a “dynamic” stretch of the M6 where the hard shoulder can be turned on and off. Just months earlier, Jamil Ahmed, 36, died in near similar circumstances at the same spot, prompting his wife, Badra, to forewarn of yet another tragedy.

It is thought that motorists may have been confused about when the hard shoulder was open or closed to them. Public awareness about the transformation of our road network has been low, with many motorists only learning about the different types of smart motorways through media coverage of those who have died.

However, Mrs Mercer’s high-profile campaigning about the dangers of smart motorways encouraged National Highways to launch its first television advertisement last year, at a cost of £5 million, which urged people to pull in and get over the barrier if their car fails to reach a refuge area. This was accused of being in bad taste as the commercial featured two fly-characters squashed against windscreen, singing “Go left!” to the Pet Shop Boys hit.

Mrs Mercer even decided to publish advice in foreign languages after realising lorry drivers, often from Eastern Europe, were involved in a number of crashes because they may not have known they could encounter stranded vehicles.

In the years since the 2006 trial, the technology used on smart motorways has repeatedly been found wanting. Documents obtained through Freedom of Information laws by this newspaper showed that the road signalling systems meant to close lanes with a red “X” have been stricken by bugs. A National Highways whistleblower revealed one piece of software had been nicknamed “Die Now” because it became unusable three times in four days, disabling signals covering huge swathes of the M1, M4, M5 and M63.

Related Posts

The Estonian commander said that his country would have won the war if the Russian Federation had attacked

According to General Martin Herem, there is currently no military threat near the Estonian border. However, the commander of the Estonian Defense Forces, Martin Herem, is not…

Europe’s youth are not ready to defend their countries – The Economist

Now European countries are thinking about bringing back military service. Europeans are not ready to defend their countries / photo REUTERS While Iran, North Korea and Russia…

What to do if you feel sleepy after eating: expert options

Why do I want to sleep after lunch is a fairly common query among people. The expert explained what to do so that you don’t want to…

China disguises its military presence in space and could capture the Moon – NASA

China is masking its military presence in space with civilian programs. China has classified its activities in space / ua.depositphotos.com China is masking its military presence in…

Ukraine can give the occupiers in Crimea an “explosive” summer, – ex-SBU employee

Stupak added that by erecting fortifications against the landing of sabotage groups, the occupiers are spoiling their holiday season Stupak said that Ukraine could arrange an “explosive”…

How many Kinzhal missiles are left in Russia’s arsenal: the Main Intelligence Directorate responded

The Main Intelligence Directorate reported that every month the Russians produce several units of this type of missile. The Main Intelligence Directorate noted that Russia, during attacks…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *