Failure to prosecute migrants arriving illegally leaves UK looking like ‘soft touch’

The CPS advised its prosecutors that migrants often had no choice in how they travelled and told them instead to focus on smugglers and repeat offenders. 

However, Tory MPs and migration campaigners said the decision was removing a key deterrent to the deadly cross-Channel trade, which this week claimed the lives of 27 migrants and left the door open to people smugglers who could make as much as £300,000 from a single boat.

The offence of illegally entering the UK carries a penalty of up to six months in prison, which the Government is increasing to four years under its Nationality and Borders Bill. Penalties for people smugglers are being raised from a maximum 14 years in prison to life imprisonment.

‘You are breaking the law’

Alp Mehmet, the chairman of Migration Watch UK, said: “Despite the public safety risks, the Government seems to have turned a blind eye to thousands of illegal arrivals even as numbers soared. This is both shocking and unacceptable to the voters who are paying for this shambles.”

Natalie Elphicke, the Dover MP, said: “Make no mistake, if you are paying criminal gangs to smuggle you into Britain in a small boat you know you are breaking the law. It’s clear we need tougher laws and firmer action to prosecute illegal entrants and stop these Channel crossings.”

Tim Loughton, a member of the home affairs committee and a former minister, said: “What should be happening is that they are arrested, put in a detention centre where they can claim asylum, then get deported. That’s the logical thing to do but it’s not happening. We’re substituting hotels for prisons.”

Some 8,000 migrants are currently being housed in hotels after a record 26,000 migrants crossed the Channel this year in small boats, treble the total of 8,714 for the whole of 2020.

As well as increasing penalties, ministers are amending the law to make it easier to prosecute illegal migrants by changing the terms of the offence from “entry” to “arrival” on the basis that those who are intercepted by Border Force and brought ashore may not technically be illegally entering the UK.

Related Posts

The Estonian commander said that his country would have won the war if the Russian Federation had attacked

According to General Martin Herem, there is currently no military threat near the Estonian border. However, the commander of the Estonian Defense Forces, Martin Herem, is not…

Europe’s youth are not ready to defend their countries – The Economist

Now European countries are thinking about bringing back military service. Europeans are not ready to defend their countries / photo REUTERS While Iran, North Korea and Russia…

What to do if you feel sleepy after eating: expert options

Why do I want to sleep after lunch is a fairly common query among people. The expert explained what to do so that you don’t want to…

China disguises its military presence in space and could capture the Moon – NASA

China is masking its military presence in space with civilian programs. China has classified its activities in space / ua.depositphotos.com China is masking its military presence in…

Ukraine can give the occupiers in Crimea an “explosive” summer, – ex-SBU employee

Stupak added that by erecting fortifications against the landing of sabotage groups, the occupiers are spoiling their holiday season Stupak said that Ukraine could arrange an “explosive”…

How many Kinzhal missiles are left in Russia’s arsenal: the Main Intelligence Directorate responded

The Main Intelligence Directorate reported that every month the Russians produce several units of this type of missile. The Main Intelligence Directorate noted that Russia, during attacks…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *