Nanny lawyer for Elon Musk – the court rejected the billionaire’s appeal, and he is still prohibited from writing anything on Twitter about Tesla

Nanny lawyer for Elon Musk - the court rejected the billionaire's appeal, and he is still prohibited from writing anything on Twitter about Tesla

Elon Musk has lost another bid to overturn a 2018 deal with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to vet some of his tweets about Tesla before publication.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Musk’s argument that the deal was an unfair “precautionary measure.” The panel found that the billionaire could have defended himself against the charges or negotiated a different deal if he really wanted to publish the tweets without legal supervision.

The legal review is a mandatory SEC requirement under the securities fraud settlement agreement that preceded Musk’s infamous tweet about “providing funds” to buy Tesla to take it private. After that, the company’s shares soared, and the SEC accused the entrepreneur of “lies and fraud.”

According to the subsequently concluded agreement with the SEC, Musk had to leave the position of chairman of the board of Tesla and pay a $20 million fine (the company itself had to pay the same amount). However, the deal did not resolve the tweets, with the commission later criticizing Musk’s new post that Tesla will produce “about 500,000 cars this year.” In a few hours, the entrepreneur clarified that he meant that “the company will produce 500,000 cars a year.”

The SEC sought to indict Musk for violating the 2018 agreement, and a judge urged the entrepreneur, the commission and Tesla to resolve their differences and find a new solution. The agreement concluded in April 2019 allowed the billionaire to use Twitter with certain restrictions regarding some events, especially financial ones, in the life of the company. In such cases, Musk must obtain prior approval from SEC counsel.

In 2022, the billionaire’s lawyers filed a motion to overturn the deal, alleging the SEC misused it to “launch an endless investigation” into Musk’s speeches and violate his right to free speech. U.S. District Judge Lewis Leeman denied the motion, and the settlement remained in effect. The billionaire’s lawyers appealed this decision, sending the case to the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals.

Related Posts

Ukrainian comic “Pitman”: whimsical science fiction with a flavor of anime and cyberpunk

Despite the war, many comics are published in Ukraine. These are not only translations, but also publications by our authors. At the end of 2022, the Vovkulaka…

Review of the film “Oppenheimer” / Oppenheimer

Each new film by Christopher Nolan is an event in itself. The director has long established himself as a first-class visionary, capable of making an intense and…

Western Bid: How Ukrainian businesses can successfully enter the foreign market

Every producer has a moment when he is interested in foreign markets and the opportunities they open. It’s just that international platforms have certain features, because of…

How the Internet of Things works and what it brings to business: 6 scenarios

72% of global industries implement IoT strategiesInternet of Things – Internet of things. The idea is to connect physical objects, establish their interaction and reduce the need…

Review of the series “Platonic relations” / Platonic

On July 12, the first season of the comedy series “Platonic Relationship” ended on the Apple TV+ platform. The main roles in it were performed by Seth…

UI/UX: a starter pack of courses for a beginner designer

Working in IT can be about creativity – successful UI/UX designers are good examples of digital artists. The concepts of UI (user interface) and UX (user experience)…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *