Water company bosses should have pay linked to pollution, head of Ofwat says

“We want to see executive pay linked to performance,” he added. “If we don’t see the kind of action that we’re expecting in terms of linking dividends and executive pay to performance, then we will make licence changes.”

Ofwat has powers to fine companies that are in breach of their operational licences, which could be changed to explicitly require a link between environmental performance and payouts.

The regulator has been criticised by MPs on the environmental audit committee, who called for “more assertive” action in a recent report on the poor state of England’s rivers.

The report called for Ofwat to require water companies to deliver year-on-year reductions in pollution incidents, with a target of zero serious incidents by 2030.

Mr Black insisted that the industry was “endeavouring” to improve its environmental record but added that the regulator “won’t hesitate” to pursue further action if they fail to do so.

Water bills increase

He also pushed back on arguments from the industry that water bills would need to increase in order to pursue investment to fix sewage spills.

“I certainly do not accept the need to wait another three years to the next price review. They have their levels of funding now. They’re responsible to comply with the obligations,” he said.

“They need to respond to public concerns. This cuts right to the heart of what they do. This is really about trust for customers.”

However, he said it was “too soon” to say whether customer bills would ultimately have to rise to deal with the challenge.

He also called for a shift in householders’ attitude to what they flush down the loo, and for the Government to ban plastic wet wipes, which can block sewers.

But he acknowledged it was a “fair question” to ask why bills should have to go up when company payouts remained high.

In 2020 the regulator announced an investigation into England’s water companies after new evidence suggested they had illegally released sewage into rivers and waterways, which could lead to fines of up to three times company profits.

“Companies need to own responsibility for their activities,” Mr Black said. “They should not wait for regulators to tell them to take action. They need to understand what the impacts are on rivers and then they need to be taking the appropriate steps to sort that out.”

Related Posts

Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company

“Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company” In Dubai, one of the most dynamically developing regions in the world, the real estate…

In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident, – media

The guy crashed into a roadside pole at high speed. In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident / illustrative…

NATO saw no signs that the Russian Federation was planning an attack on one of the Alliance countries

Bauer recalled that according to Article 3 of the NATO treaty, every country must be able to defend itself. Rob Bauer commented on concerns that Russia is…

The Russian Federation has modernized the Kh-101 missile, doubling its warhead, analysts

The installation of an additional warhead in addition to the conventional high-explosive fragmentation one occurred due to a reduction in the size of the fuel tank. The…

Four people killed by storm in European holiday destinations

The deaths come amid warnings of high winds and rain thanks to Storm Nelson. Rescuers discovered bodies in two separate incidents / photo ua.depositphotos.com Four people, including…

Egg baba: a centuries-old recipe of 24 yolks for Catholic Easter

They like to put it in the Easter basket in Poland. However, many countries have their own variations of “bab”. The woman’s original recipe is associated with…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *