Gurkhas allowed to stay in Britain without paying for a visa

However, two prominent MPs, both of whom served in the Army, said that the Government should also have included spouses and children in the new policy.

In a joint statement, the Tories’ Johnny Mercer and Labour’s Dan Jarvis said they “remain concerned that families continue to be sidelined”.

The new policy amounted only to a 25 per cent discount on a typical visa fee bill of £10,000 for a family of four, according to the MPs.

“Men and women from the Commonwealth and Nepal have a long and proud history of leaving their homes so we can sleep safely in ours.

“It is deeply unjust for the Government to profit from them exercising their right to remain in the country for which they risked their lives.”

Paying tribute to the “thousands of brave men and women” from overseas who have served in the military”, Priti Patel said “fundamental principles” of immigration rules meant that the policy could not be extended to whole family groups.

“You can’t just do it carte blanche for the Armed Forces without having knock-on repercussions for other aspects of immigration rules,” the Home Secretary said.

“Waiving the visa fee for those Commonwealth veterans and Gurkhas with six years’ service who want to settle here is a suitable way of acknowledging their personal contribution and service to our nation.”

Foreign dependants ‘are looked after’

Currently, there are more than 9,000 non-UK citizens serving in the Armed Forces from countries around the world including Australia, Canada, Fiji, Ghana, India, Jamaica, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, St Lucia and South Africa, many of whom may consider applying for indefinite leave to remain in the UK when their service ends.

Dependants of overseas soldiers are already given a five-year settlement to stay in the UK, as opposed to regular applicants who get only a year. They also do not have to pay the health surcharge, as others do, and are exempt from the Life in the UK and language tests.

Mr Wallace said it would be “fundamentally unfair” to pay for the families of foreign soldiers, but not pay for foreign nationals who are married to British soldiers.

Foreign dependants “are already at an advantage compared to other dependants of foreign workers in the public sector”, he said, adding: “They are looked after.”

Related Posts

Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company

“Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company” In Dubai, one of the most dynamically developing regions in the world, the real estate…

In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident, – media

The guy crashed into a roadside pole at high speed. In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident / illustrative…

NATO saw no signs that the Russian Federation was planning an attack on one of the Alliance countries

Bauer recalled that according to Article 3 of the NATO treaty, every country must be able to defend itself. Rob Bauer commented on concerns that Russia is…

The Russian Federation has modernized the Kh-101 missile, doubling its warhead, analysts

The installation of an additional warhead in addition to the conventional high-explosive fragmentation one occurred due to a reduction in the size of the fuel tank. The…

Four people killed by storm in European holiday destinations

The deaths come amid warnings of high winds and rain thanks to Storm Nelson. Rescuers discovered bodies in two separate incidents / photo ua.depositphotos.com Four people, including…

Egg baba: a centuries-old recipe of 24 yolks for Catholic Easter

They like to put it in the Easter basket in Poland. However, many countries have their own variations of “bab”. The woman’s original recipe is associated with…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *