We workers are punished by unfair pension rules – but civil servants get off scot free

In a speech this week, Rishi Sunak said he believed we should all “be able to make decisions about how to save, invest or use the money we earn” and that it is “far better spent by individuals and businesses than government”.

We quite agree, Chancellor. A good place to start would be our pensions.

It is unsporting enough that the Treasury taxes pensions above £1,073,100 at an astonishing 55pc, lining its pockets with the hard-earned retirement savings of hundreds of thousands of workers.

But it is outright foul play that this lifetime allowance does not affect all savers the same way.

Most private sector workers today are already barred from more generous “defined benefit” pensions, which pay out an inflation-linked annual salary guaranteed for life.

Instead, they save into “defined contribution” pensions – invested personal savings pots that are vulnerable to market falls and have no guaranteed value.

These pots are harder to grow, as employers must pay in just 3pc of a worker’s salary, meaning the employee has to sacrifice much more than the minimum 5pc of their salary to amass enough savings. A civil servant putting in 5-7pc of their salary, meanwhile, enjoys employer top-ups of 27-30pc.

The salt in the wound of this stark inequity is the different way the lifetime allowance is applied. Although the tax-free limit is the same for both types of pensions, this figure is calculated for defined benefit pensions by multiplying the annual retirement income by 20.

This means a person could take an income of £53,655 a year before breaching the lifetime allowance. If they lived for 30 years, enjoying a total income of £1.6m, they would still incur no tax charge.

By contrast, a retiree with a defined contribution pension worth the maximum tax-free amount who bought an inflation-linked joint-life annuity would earn just £22,778 a year. Same lifetime allowance, less than half the annual income.

Put another way: a private sector worker would need to save £2.5m – with higher salary sacrifices and more investment risk – to be able to pay the tax charge and buy the same retirement income as a public sector employee.

Related Posts

Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company

“Property Management in Dubai: Effective Rental Strategies and Choosing a Management Company” In Dubai, one of the most dynamically developing regions in the world, the real estate…

In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident, – media

The guy crashed into a roadside pole at high speed. In Poland, an 18-year-old Ukrainian ran away from the police and died in an accident / illustrative…

NATO saw no signs that the Russian Federation was planning an attack on one of the Alliance countries

Bauer recalled that according to Article 3 of the NATO treaty, every country must be able to defend itself. Rob Bauer commented on concerns that Russia is…

The Russian Federation has modernized the Kh-101 missile, doubling its warhead, analysts

The installation of an additional warhead in addition to the conventional high-explosive fragmentation one occurred due to a reduction in the size of the fuel tank. The…

Four people killed by storm in European holiday destinations

The deaths come amid warnings of high winds and rain thanks to Storm Nelson. Rescuers discovered bodies in two separate incidents / photo ua.depositphotos.com Four people, including…

Egg baba: a centuries-old recipe of 24 yolks for Catholic Easter

They like to put it in the Easter basket in Poland. However, many countries have their own variations of “bab”. The woman’s original recipe is associated with…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *